Mortgage Loan Cost Surge: Why $11,094 per Funded Loan Demands a New Operating Model

Article Summary
Mortgage Bankers Association data shows cost per funded loan increased 57% over 10 years, reaching $11,094 in 2025. The piece points to stacked point solutions and handoff-heavy workflows as drivers, and outlines a batch and task-based operating model.
image description


In 2015, it cost the mortgage industry $7,046 to fund a loan. In 2025, it cost $11,094. That’s a 57% increase in 10 years.



Source: Mortgage Bankers Association’s Annual Performance Report Series. Cost per Funded Loan is defined as “Fully Loaded Loan Production Expense: includes personnel expenses, occupancy and equipment and miscellaneous expenses for sales, fulfillment and post-closing activity. Also includes corporate allocations.”



If we go back even further, our lowest cost of origination was in 2009 when our industry closed a little less than $2 trillion in volume with a $3,685 cost per funded loan. There was no generative AI in 2009 and we were in the middle of the Great Recession.



So, why have our costs gone up so much?



The easiest explanation is that cost per loan is just math. It’s fixed cost spread over the units of funded loans. When volume drops, cost per funded loan naturally will rise. The data unfortunately suggests there is more to it.



A problem beyond simple math


2020 and 2021 were two of the largest origination years in my career. If this is just math, you’d expect those years to have the lowest cost per funded loan, but the cost actually increased from $7,535 in 2019 to $8,664 in 2021.



Now, if we look at comparable markets, in 2019, our industry funded $2.25 trillion at $7,535 per loan. In 2025, we funded $2.0 trillion at $11,094.



Volume up, cost up…Volume flat…cost up. This isn’t a math problem. So, let’s look at the bigger picture.



In 2009, we had the same basic process that we do today, but our people had different responsibilities. Most mortgage companies operated with an LOS and a client relationship manager (CRM). Our people were our POS, our PPE, our income calculators, our fee calculators, etc. So, our cost structure was different.



That no longer works because consumer expectations have shifted drastically. They expect almost instant feedback loops and to be able to self-serve as many areas of our process as they feel comfortable with.



In response, we’ve stacked technology solution upon technology solution upon technology solution, but we haven’t changed anything about our team’s responsibilities or our process. We buy tools that solve a very specific problem, then set it on top of the existing process and our existing team.



That’s why 10 years of technology investments haven’t yielded the results we wanted. Automation and technology solutions have allowed for us to become incrementally more efficient, but not more effective.



Rethinking the mortgage assembly line


For most of the industry, our process is built for paper. Each stage has a hand off where one person hands off work to another person.



Loan officers hand off their file to a processor, who checks the work of the loan officer and then hands the file to an underwriter.


The underwriter then checks the work of the processor and loan officer and hands it back with a list of things that need to be completed. And, the cycle continues…



Three people review the same documents. Each of those hand offs adds time to our process that leads to frustration for our customers (and likely our teams).



This doesn’t have to be the process any more.



In 1913, Henry Ford studied slaughter houses and how they produced meat. Then, he brought that process to the automobile industry. We all know about his famous moving assembly line. This moving assembly line is very similar to our process today…113 years later.



Years later, Toyota rethought the automobile manufacturing process by breaking work into small batches and pushed decision making authority down to the people doing the work. Same product, radically lower cost.



Then, again, years later software manufacturers announced their Agile manifesto that allowed for collaborative, task-based work speeding up the delivery time drastically from their former model.



If we combine what we learned from Toyota and software manufacturers, we have a new model available to us. And, this is where the magic lives.



Small batches and faster feedback loops



We can break down the work that we do into “big rocks,” “small batches” and “tasks.” Then, your team collaborates to complete the tasks that are needed. Once all of the tasks are completed within a small batch of work, you’re done with that batch.



Now, let’s apply this to our industry. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac say that our industry has to analyze the borrower (big rock #1), the property (big rock #2), etc for eligibility. When we analyze the borrower, we have to analyze credit (small batch #1), income/employment (small batch #2), etc. When we analyze income/employment, we need to review paystubs (task #1), W2s (task #2), etc.



Here’s where this process change flips everything we’ve ever known on its head.



Regardless of where the borrower is in their home buying journey, if we have all of the data/documents we need to make a decision on the income/employment for that borrower, we can make a DECISION (with expiration dates of course) on that component of the loan.



Designing your process this way allows for borrowers to have faster feedback loops on critical components of their loan. It lets us queue work to our team exactly when it’s needed on smaller components of the loan. And, it allows for us to place AI or technology exactly where it needs to go, not waiting on a hand-off or milestone to complete the work it’s built to do.



The financial impact of a new operating model



This doesn’t eliminate the need for the loan officer, the underwriter and auditors to review the loan file holistically, but everything else can be queued work.



Now, how does this actually lower our cost of origination?



This operating model puts the work that needs to be completed in front of the decision maker right away. It doesn’t take for example a loan officer, then technology, then processor, then finally underwriting to make an income/employment decision.


See what I mean? Our current process forces redundant work and a delayed, frustrating customer experience.


It has inflated our cost structure.



This new operating model allows us to do more with the same amount of teammates.


You can grow volume effectively without adding more overhead.


However, this isn’t just an efficiency play.



In 2025, the MBA reported an industry average cost per funded loan at $11,094.


The most profitable 20% of lenders during that same period had a cost of $10,074.


So, even if this model could only allow the industry to be as effective as the top 20%, we would see $5.5 billion in savings.



Melissa Langdale is chief executive officer and founder of Praxis Lending Solutions.


This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of HousingWire’s editorial department and its owners.


To contact the editor responsible for this piece: zeb@hwmedia.com.



Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *